Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts

Monday, 18 August 2014

Can 200,000 signatures be ignored?

Well - crack out the champaign and raise a glass to No More Page Three. As of today, the campaign that I have been a supporter of for over a year, has reached 200,000 signatures. This is a huge achievement for NMP3 and for British feminism. Despite being nowhere near the Sun's estimated audience, this is a huge amount of people standing up against the paper's most well-known segment.

When I promoted the campaign earlier this week, a Twitter user who is campaigning against the illegalisation of pornography sent me a link to an article about how NMP3, although gaining support, is expanding very slowly and it isn't worth our time. I don't think this is true, after all, every little helps.

In an age where videos of cats get millions of views overnight, it is of course (in theory) very easy to get such a campaign up and moving quickly. But we forget that this is a feminist campaign against the biggest tabloid newspaper in the country. News Corp have been able to get away with brushing away allegations made against them for years. Look at the amount of time it took for the News Of The World scandal to unfold and look how it panned out. At this very moment, Rebekah Brooks is a free woman regardless of her dubious "innocence". Justice does not concern Murdoch or his media empire, they continue to be the biggest in Britain regardless of the Leveson Enquiry and they continue to carry on giving the public news via unethical and corrupt methods. Feminism isn't an easy issue to bring forward to such a corporation either. The media is dominated by male figures and we still live in an age where dominant female figures' efforts are still undermined by how they look. The unruly woman is a huge part of our media and culture. Look at female journalists and broadcasters. Mary Beard, although an accomplished historian and presenter receives huge amounts of hate because of the way she looks. Laurie Penny is demonised  for reclaiming words such as "queer" and "slut" as well as for supporting sex workers rights and standing up against patriarchy through left-wing methods. Charlotte Smith was axed from Countryfile for being "too old" despite being 45 at the time. No matter how loud feminists shout, these issues remain unaddressed and we are just told to deal with it.

Bearing this in mind, NMP3 has been a huge success. A large number of universities around the country that have now boycotted the Sun from their campus after they staged votes on the matter. Although, in some people's opinion, the NMP3 campaign lacks backing, former page 3 models as well as leading feminist figures have shown their support for it and it is now a large voice in the feminist movement. I think the campaign can't be ignored because it has been acknowledged by the Sun newspaper. There is no doubt that the Sun's "Check 'em Tuesday" segment has been influenced by the fall in support for page 3. 200,000 supporters is a huge amount and will continue to grow and become more and more influential. If you haven't yet signed the campaign, I urge you to as it is free and a very good cause.

Sign the petition here: http://chn.ge/1sQ5PjU
Follow me on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1ySxHlH

Sunday, 18 May 2014

Why is Media Studies a subject worth keeping?

Rumour has it that the government aren't sure whether or not they will be keeping Media Studies as a qualification as of 2016 as a GCE qualification. As a student who has taken the GCSE and is currently studying A-Level Media (as well as it being my favourite subject), I am outraged that in the near future children won't be able to learn about the world via the media.

Firstly, lets get some misconceptions out of the way about GCE Media Studies:

  • It is an easy subject - Nope, It is ridiculously academic. Although the subject is heavily coursework based, it is also heavily based on knowledge that you have obtained elsewhere about the outside world. "Good Media students", as one of my teachers would say, are having to constantly be looking out for things that could be used within the subject. What I have noticed about doing AS Media is that I can no longer just watch an advert and that be that, I have to analyse it as I watch it looking out for "mise-en-scene" and "representations" and whether or not "the advert is a cliché of every other advert ever". A couple of weeks ago we were given the "revision guide" for our Media exam this Friday and it was a sheet of A4 paper. Although we have less exams than other A-Levels (because we do coursework through out the year), we cannot revise because the exam specification is so broad, the questions could be on anything as well as the exam being 2h30 long making it (I think) the longest exam apart from Art. As I say to my friends, "the Media exam is hard because it isn't a memory test.". In subjects such as the sciences, the answers are determined from the guides the exam board release where as (like I said before) the Media exam can be on anything.
  • It is a girl's subject - The same as the sciences are a boy's subject? Let us not forget that as close as 40 years ago, journalism was a form of MEDIA almost exclusively run by men. It has only been it the past few decades that we have seen strong and truly amazing women come into the profession. Yes, in my Media class there is probably one boy to every three girls but journalism is still predominantly a male profession and many of them are there out of privilege rather than the quality of what they are saying. Look at current journalists such as Owen Jones who is from a working class background standing up for the mis-representation of the working class in the media, he came from state funded education and now regularly writes for the Independent as well as being a successful author as a result of his books on the working class. He is one of the most intelligent people I can think of in today's media and he is a "normal bloke".
So with these two misconceptions straightened out why does our male-dominated, academic government feel that Media Studies isn't worth our time? Well, this is my theory: I believe that the media run the world. They can take a reasonably good politician and make him look bad as well as taking a reasonably bad politician look good. We do not listen to the government directly, we listen to the media's (already altered) view on what the government have told us and so (depending on what paper/channel we hear it from) we are going to take that view rather than the government's direct view. It isn't just politics, it is everything... two-step flow theory: the mass media (ie: everything that is going on in the world at present) is picked up by the media - called "the gatekeeper" (ie: newspapers, news channels, blogs etc) and give it to you. It could be a kind of soap or a film, anything! Media tycoons are some of the richest and most powerful in the world. Rupert Murdoch has more money than sense and has political influences not only in the U.K but in America also. Simon Cowell has dictated what kind of music the world listens to for about 20 years now. The media has tremendous power over the world we live in today.

To me, I think that politicians are seeing a form of aid for themselves (in order to increase voters or boost popularity etc) slowly begin to become more powerful and more influential than government itself. Social media, for example, has given everyone with internet access a voice to be heard by people across the world (even me, a 17-year old school girl) and with that people are able to see what is actually going on in the world without the aid of two-step flow and it has become much easier for people to question what the government are actually doing. Also, an increasing amount of young people from working backgrounds are coming into the media with left-wing views (many of which are women) threatens the Etonian, right-wing government that are currently in power. They want to decrease the power of left media before people actually begin to question the greedy policies that the "selfservatives" puke out upon the British public.

Of course, I am not saying that this is a feminist attack or that the sciences are any less important than the arts as Media Studies tends the reflect both and you can look at the media via both routes. I just cannot stand people bringing it down because it is a subject that they haven't bothered their time to partake in and won't because women do it. If there is such a push to get more women into sciences such as engineering and physics then surely shouldn't we also be trying to encourage more men into media? 

As someone who hopes to study Media at university, I, naturally, would say it is the best subject in the world but let me tell you one thing. When I chose Media as an opinion in year 9, I thought it would be the most boring piece of crap I'd ever experienced yet I now it is something that my life revolves around. 

I couldn't embed an extract lecture by Owen Jones on the working-class that we watched this year in Media into post so here is a link to it.

What do you think about Media Studies as a qualification? Please leave a comment!