Showing posts with label Socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Socialism. Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

"Shit, I am a feminist!"

At the age of roughly 14 I became aware of Marxism. It was my Dad who taught me about it and it is a huge part of my personal beliefs about what the world should be like. I have spent my time since then within the left field of political thinking with my ideals of the world maturing and changing as I am exposed to more and more stories about the planet on which we live. Over the next three years, no doubt, those opinions and beliefs will be refined more and will continue to be so for the rest of my life. My Dad had always told me about equality within class and how the worker is oppressed by capitalism, I then took that viewpoint further when I started to form opinions based on issues regarding race and how white supremacy was still an active and dangerous part of our culture.

The biggest shift for me happened roughly a year ago when I came across two twitter accounts, the first being: @NoMorePage3 which as you'd expect, is a campaign to stop the objectification of women in tabloid newspapers and magazines such as the Sun. Although I knew about misrepresentation of women in the media and I was outraged by it, I didn't really think that it was something I could change. To find something that today is actually having a huge influence on the media industry and be part of a community of just under 200,000 people  who have signed the petition (as of 16/07/14) is an amazing thing. The second account was that of Laurie Penny who is a journalist, author and the contributing editor of the New Statesman. When I read Penny's work, I completely agreed with what she was saying about women and how they are treated by the world we live in. I watched her lectures and was amazed at how much she was speaking to me. Eventually, I finished a YouTube video of Laurie Penny talking at Oxford and thought "Shit, I am a feminist!".

As a girl who wants to enter the media industry, I feel it is important to understand it. I just went on a tour of MediaCityUK yesterday and also went to the tour around the BBC in London with school earlier this year. I travelled to Goldsmith College from Leicestershire after school one day last month to she both Laurie Penny and the No More Page Three Campaign talk about sexism in the media. I buy myself papers, watch the news, read books, anything I can to understand what the world I live in does and why it does it. At this point in my life, I want to consume as much knowledge about the world around me as I possibly can so that I can grow up to be a cultured individual that is breaking the mould of modern living. The reason I think Media Studies is such an important subject is because it lets me do that and as my Media teacher said to me recently, you can't do Media Studies and not be a feminist. 

When I first realised that I was a feminist I was confused because feminists were loud mouthed, militant women who didn't shave their armpits and hated men. Now I have friends who call me militant and at times I can shout about my point of view for hours but I didn't and still don't associate myself with that stereotype of "the feminist". I certainly don't hate men, a lot of my friends are men, I have a loving boyfriend, I am in a class where, apart from me, every member of it is a man. Currently I am reading Unspeakable Things by Laurie Penny and even one chapter in, the book is one of the most influential and important texts I have ever read. In the book she talks about how you don't need to be that stereotype, you don't need to not shave, not wear make up, not wear deodorant because with feminism comes individualism and we all have the right to be who want to be and believe what we want to believe.

I was inspired to write this after reading something a friend on Facebook said about the feminist movement. She was saying how we don't need feminism in this country and instead of British and American feminists focusing on equal pay and getting stuff handed to us on a plate, we should focus on "a country like India... when you get stoned to death because you didn't marry who your family wanted to.". Yes, the feminist movement does focus of Asian countries "like India" - only days ago the whole feminist movement celebrated  the first ever Malala Day (July 12th) which honours Malala Yousafzai who was shot in the head last year after she stood up against the Taliban for her right for an education in Pakistan. Having made a full recovery, Malala (now 17) is a key feminist figure with a worldwide best selling book about her experiences. Yes, women in middle-eastern culture do face worse problems than those in western culture but that's not to say that the issues aren't universal.

Forced marriage and female genital mutilation are huge issues abroad but they are hugely prominent in the U.K too. Equally, workers rights and gender stereotypes are huge issues abroad. The reason we don't see it abroad (ie: on the news and in newspapers) is because we don't see it here. Patriarchal media forbids coverage of such nature being the greedy, capitalist industry it is. Universally, all of these problems exist and the feminist movement is fighting all of them. If you come across a feminist who believes feminist issues are more important in the U.K than abroad, that is not a feminist, that is an elitist and a racist. The feminist movement is essentially a socialist one - as Laurie Penny says: "Socialism without feminism, after all, is no socialism worth having.".

The feminist movement is a collection of ALL WOMEN standing up to be counted. Just because you are a white girl of privilege doesn't mean you can't be outraged by the world we live in. Feminism isn't a hate movement that is necessarily militant. It isn't about men, it is about culture. Feminism is standing up for what is right.

Leave me a comment!

Monday, 19 May 2014

Socialism is human nature?

So I was on Reddit the other day and came across this image. As you can probably see it is promoting the ideology of Socialism by saying that it is human nature. Although I am a socialist, I don't agree with this picture, in fact, I completely disagree with it as I believe that Capitalism is human nature.

In case you're not familiar, here is a very simple explanation of both socialism and capitalism:

  • Socialism is the philosophy that everyone is equal and should be treated equally thus equal rights, equal pay etc. The idea is that everyone works together to make a collective achievement.
  • Capitalism is essentially 'survival of the fittest'. The idea is that we all earn our way through our own individual achievements which build up into power. If someone decides not to work (or cannot) they do not achieve.
Darwin came up with the 'Theory of Evolution' in 1838 which taught us that all organisms on Earth stemmed from the same species 'once upon a time'. The idea is that rather than God creating everything for its individual purposes (ie: Humans at the top because they're are in God's image) we evolved as a result of certain circumstances that forced us to adapt to our surroundings thus suggesting that we humans descended from the apes (ie: we were designed in the image of Rafiki from 'The Lion King'). Along with this came the idea of survival of the fittest which to a certain degree explained the extremely capitalist world of Darwin's time as us humans had gotten to the top of the food chain because we were the smartest and therefore the best of all the other animals. As time passed, we saw that we had dominated the animal kingdom and so we decided to exploit our own through feudalism, slavery, dictatorships and so the Western World and capitalism were born. Despite this some right-wing people still believe that we are "made in God's image" even though Darwinism sums up their ideologies perfectly.

So, if we evolved from the animals then we still have the same instincts as animals. After all, we eat when we're hungry, clean when we're dirty, sleep when we're sleepy etc and it is obvious that we have succeeded in the "survival of the fittest" game almost automatically. As the first point on the poster says: "HUMANS COULD NOT HAVE SURVIVED WITHOUT COOPERATION" which is true, we have helped eachother much like pack animals do (eg: wolves). We have proven that we are individually weak but collectively strong (which, after all, is essentially socialism) but also shown "survival of the fittest" in doing so. We have constantly been in conflict with each other since our species left Africa - fighting for land, resources, POWER because it is "instinctive" to do so in order to survive.

The second point, about charity, doesn't settle well with me at all as charity is not something that we as humans do lightly. Over the past few months Stephen Sutton raised £3 million for cancer charities as part of his bucket list after being diagnosed with terminal cancer in 2012. This was through the help of the British public backed up by various celebrities such as: Jason Manford, Jonathan Ross and Jimmy Carr. In months previous, there was the "No make-up selfie" in which women were urged to pay £3 to Cancer Research and take a selfie with no make up on and post it to social media and in return they receive praise. Although both of these campaigns are both incredibly good and have raised a lot for cancer charities, people still walk by people with money pots looking for the same reasons. In general we only give to charity if we're going to get something out of it. I'll let this video do the talking:


We are capitalist. Capitalism is human nature but despite this I don't think that this always has to be the case. As I said earlier, we have the capability to adapt and change and I do really hope that one day we become less greedy and help each other more. Maybe one day we will change but until then we are capitalist by design.

What do you think? Please leave me a comment.

Follow me on Twitter.